On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:54:06PM +0530, prahlad venkata wrote:
> Did anybody got chance to review this patch?
> I feel this is a trivial yet required fix.
Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:54:06PM +0530, prahlad venkata wrote:
> Did anybody got chance to review this patch?
> I feel this is a trivial yet required fix.
Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and
Did anybody got chance to review this patch?
I feel this is a trivial yet required fix.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Prahlad V wrote:
>
> completion variable should be reinitialized before reusing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Prahlad V
> ---
>
Did anybody got chance to review this patch?
I feel this is a trivial yet required fix.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Prahlad V wrote:
>
> completion variable should be reinitialized before reusing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Prahlad V
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1
completion variable should be reinitialized before reusing.
Signed-off-by: Prahlad V
---
drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
index caeac66..ec6fb09 100644
---
completion variable should be reinitialized before reusing.
Signed-off-by: Prahlad V
---
drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
index caeac66..ec6fb09 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
+++
6 matches
Mail list logo