On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 09:09:00 +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Since commit 4977caef05aa ("kthread: work could not be queued when worker
> being destroyed") there is a warning when kworker is used without the
> internal 'task' entry properly initialized. Fix this by using
> a kthread_create_worker()
On Wed 2020-07-08 09:09:00, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Since commit 4977caef05aa ("kthread: work could not be queued when worker
> being destroyed")
This commit should disappear from linux-next soon. We did not expect
that it would cause these warnings. We first want to fix the callers
before we pu
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 09:09:00AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> [ cut here ]
> WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1 at kernel/kthread.c:817 kthread_queue_work+0xac/0xd4
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.8.0-rc4-00017-g4977caef05aa #1193
> Hardware nam
Since commit 4977caef05aa ("kthread: work could not be queued when worker
being destroyed") there is a warning when kworker is used without the
internal 'task' entry properly initialized. Fix this by using
a kthread_create_worker() helper instead of open-coding a kworker
initialization.
This fixes
4 matches
Mail list logo