On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 05:28:56PM +0300, Kirill Kapranov wrote:
> On 08/14/2018 05:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Is this something that's actually happened for you?
> Yes, I observed it.
OK, that's useful to know - it differentiates between a nice to have fix
and something that should be sent to
On 08/14/2018 05:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> Is this something that's actually happened for you?
Yes, I observed it.
Background:
The platform: fitlet2 [1] , CPU Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J3455 @ 1.50GHz.
On an extension board there are three SPI master controllers "Intel
Corporation Atom/Celeron/P
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 07:48:10PM +0300, Kirill Kapranov wrote:
> On systems where some controllers get a dynamic ID assigned and some have
> a fixed number (e.g. from ACPI tables), the current implementation might
> run into an IDR collision: in case of a fixed bus number is gotten by a
> driver
On systems where some controllers get a dynamic ID assigned and some have
a fixed number (e.g. from ACPI tables), the current implementation might
run into an IDR collision: in case of a fixed bus number is gotten by a
driver (but not marked busy in IDR tree) and a driver with dynamic bus
number ge
4 matches
Mail list logo
