On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 08:36:30AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On 2/15/2018 6:42 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:59:54PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> >>We should've kept sp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp the furthest. But
> >>it probably fails because of the incorrect condit
On 2/15/2018 6:42 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:59:54PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
We should've kept sp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp the furthest. But
it probably fails because of the incorrect condition. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park
Good catch, and thank you f
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:59:54PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> We should've kept sp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp the furthest. But
> it probably fails because of the incorrect condition. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park
Good catch, and thank you for reviewing the SRCU code, but Ildar Isma
We should've kept sp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp the furthest. But
it probably fails because of the incorrect condition. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park
---
kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
i
4 matches
Mail list logo