>>> On 02.11.12 at 22:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:44:08 +
> "Jan Beulich" wrote:
>
>> This is another step towards better standard conformance. Rather than
>> adding a local buffer to store the specified portion of the string
>> (with the need to enforce an arbitrary ma
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:44:08 +
"Jan Beulich" wrote:
> This is another step towards better standard conformance. Rather than
> adding a local buffer to store the specified portion of the string
> (with the need to enforce an arbitrary maximum supported width to
> limit the buffer size), do a m
This is another step towards better standard conformance. Rather than
adding a local buffer to store the specified portion of the string
(with the need to enforce an arbitrary maximum supported width to
limit the buffer size), do a maximum width conversion and then drop as
much of it as is necessar
3 matches
Mail list logo
