On 03/01/2013 06:29 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
From: Ric Mason [mailto:ric.mas...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie to
a config option
On 02/07/2013 02:27 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache
> From: Ric Mason [mailto:ric.mas...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
> to a config option
>
> On 02/07/2013 02:27 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get &quo
From: Ric Mason [mailto:ric.mas...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
to a config option
On 02/07/2013 02:27 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get full
and there must be some way
On 03/01/2013 06:29 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
From: Ric Mason [mailto:ric.mas...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie to
a config option
On 02/07/2013 02:27 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache
> From: Ric Mason [mailto:ric.mas...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
> to a config option
>
> On 02/26/2013 01:29 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> >> From: Ric Mason [mailto:ric.mas...@gmail.com]
> >> Subject
From: Ric Mason [mailto:ric.mas...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
to a config option
On 02/26/2013 01:29 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
From: Ric Mason [mailto:ric.mas...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve
On 02/26/2013 01:29 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
From: Ric Mason [mailto:ric.mas...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie to
a config option
On 02/07/2013 02:27 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache
> From: Ric Mason [mailto:ric.mas...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
> to a config option
>
> On 02/07/2013 02:27 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get &quo
From: Ric Mason [mailto:ric.mas...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
to a config option
On 02/07/2013 02:27 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get full
and there must be some way
On 02/26/2013 01:29 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
From: Ric Mason [mailto:ric.mas...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie to
a config option
On 02/07/2013 02:27 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache
On 02/07/2013 02:27 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get "full"
and there must be some way for compressed swap pages to be (uncompressed
and then) sent through to the backing swap disk. A prototype of this
functionality, called "unuse", was
On 02/07/2013 02:27 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get "full"
and there must be some way for compressed swap pages to be (uncompressed
and then) sent through to the backing swap disk. A prototype of this
functionality, called "unuse", was
On 02/07/2013 02:27 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get full
and there must be some way for compressed swap pages to be (uncompressed
and then) sent through to the backing swap disk. A prototype of this
functionality, called unuse, was
On 02/07/2013 02:27 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get full
and there must be some way for compressed swap pages to be (uncompressed
and then) sent through to the backing swap disk. A prototype of this
functionality, called unuse, was
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 08:55:29AM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> For completeness, I thought I should add some planning items
> that ARE new functionality. In my opinion, these can wait
> until after promotion, but mm developers may have different
> opinions:
>
> ZCACHE FUTURE NEW
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
> to a config option
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:43:58PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundatio
From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
to a config option
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:43:58PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
So, how about
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 08:55:29AM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
For completeness, I thought I should add some planning items
that ARE new functionality. In my opinion, these can wait
until after promotion, but mm developers may have different
opinions:
ZCACHE FUTURE NEW FUNCTIONALITY
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:43:58PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
>
> > So, how about this, please draw up a specific plan for how you are going
> > to get this code out of drivers/staging/ I want to see the steps
> > involved, who is going to
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:43:58PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
So, how about this, please draw up a specific plan for how you are going
to get this code out of drivers/staging/ I want to see the steps
involved, who is going to be doing
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get "full"
and there must be some way for compressed swap pages to be (uncompressed
and then) sent through to the backing swap disk. A prototype of this
functionality, called "unuse", was added in 2012 as part of a major update
to zcache
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
> to a config option
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:43:58PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundatio
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:43:58PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
>
> > So, how about this, please draw up a specific plan for how you are going
> > to get this code out of drivers/staging/ I want to see the steps
> > involved, who is going to
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> So, how about this, please draw up a specific plan for how you are going
> to get this code out of drivers/staging/ I want to see the steps
> involved, who is going to be doing the work, and who you are going to
> have to get to agree with
From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
So, how about this, please draw up a specific plan for how you are going
to get this code out of drivers/staging/ I want to see the steps
involved, who is going to be doing the work, and who you are going to
have to get to agree with your
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:43:58PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
So, how about this, please draw up a specific plan for how you are going
to get this code out of drivers/staging/ I want to see the steps
involved, who is going to be doing
From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
to a config option
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:43:58PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
So, how about
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get full
and there must be some way for compressed swap pages to be (uncompressed
and then) sent through to the backing swap disk. A prototype of this
functionality, called unuse, was added in 2012 as part of a major update
to zcache
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 02:42:11PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > Yes, but these mm changes are in no one's trees, and I have no idea if
> > they ever will be merged.
>
> OK, I can try pushing on the "egg" side for awhile :-(
>
> > This patch looks to me that it is adding new functionality,
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
> to a config option
>
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 12:51:25PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundatio
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 12:51:25PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
> > to a config option
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:27:41A
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
> to a config option
>
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:27:41AM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:27:41AM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get "full"
> and there must be some way for compressed swap pages to be (uncompressed
> and then) sent through to the backing swap disk. A prototype of this
>
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get "full"
and there must be some way for compressed swap pages to be (uncompressed
and then) sent through to the backing swap disk. A prototype of this
functionality, called "unuse", was added in 2012 as part of a major update
to zcache
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get full
and there must be some way for compressed swap pages to be (uncompressed
and then) sent through to the backing swap disk. A prototype of this
functionality, called unuse, was added in 2012 as part of a major update
to zcache
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:27:41AM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get full
and there must be some way for compressed swap pages to be (uncompressed
and then) sent through to the backing swap disk. A prototype of this
functionality,
From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
to a config option
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:27:41AM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
It was observed by Andrea Arcangeli in 2011 that zcache can get full
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 12:51:25PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
to a config option
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:27:41AM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote
From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/zcache: Fix/improve zcache writeback code, tie
to a config option
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 12:51:25PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Subject: Re: [PATCH
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 02:42:11PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
Yes, but these mm changes are in no one's trees, and I have no idea if
they ever will be merged.
OK, I can try pushing on the egg side for awhile :-(
This patch looks to me that it is adding new functionality, and not
40 matches
Mail list logo
