On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:12:10AM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> On 1/24/19 9:24 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > What do you think about renaming ion_allocation_data.unused to heap_id
> > and adding a flag instead? It's adding cruft to a staging API, but it
> > might soften the transit
On 1/24/19 9:24 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 01:28:35PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> Previously the heap to allocate from was selected by a mask of allowed
>> heap types. This may have been done as a primitive form of constraint
>> solving, the first heap t
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 01:28:35PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> Previously the heap to allocate from was selected by a mask of allowed
> heap types. This may have been done as a primitive form of constraint
> solving, the first heap type that matched any set bit of the heap mask
> wa
Previously the heap to allocate from was selected by a mask of allowed
heap types. This may have been done as a primitive form of constraint
solving, the first heap type that matched any set bit of the heap mask
was allocated from, unless that heap was excluded by having its heap
ID bit not set in
4 matches
Mail list logo