On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:39:05PM -0800, shalin mehta wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Should I send this patch again due the spelling mistake in the patch
> description?
>
Yes. And put what Oleg Drokin said about it worked because there were
no users in the changelog.
regards,
dan carpenter
Hello,
Should I send this patch again due the spelling mistake in the patch
description?
Thanks,
Shalin
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Shalin Mehta wrote:
>
>> The parentehsis are fixed in the macro for the ldlm lock to set and
>> clear th
On Feb 14, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Shalin Mehta wrote:
> The parentehsis are fixed in the macro for the ldlm lock to set and
> clear the flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shalin Mehta
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm_flags.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
On Feb 15, 2016, at 9:28 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 07:37:02PM -0800, Shalin Mehta wrote:
>> The parentehsis are fixed in the macro for the ldlm lock to set and
>> clear the flags.
>
> "fixed" in what way? Did you test-build this patch? Also, you
> mispelled a word here…
The
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 07:37:02PM -0800, Shalin Mehta wrote:
> The parentehsis are fixed in the macro for the ldlm lock to set and
> clear the flags.
"fixed" in what way? Did you test-build this patch? Also, you
mispelled a word here...
thanks,
greg k-h
The parentehsis are fixed in the macro for the ldlm lock to set and
clear the flags.
Signed-off-by: Shalin Mehta
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm_flags.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm_f
6 matches
Mail list logo
