On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:21:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Ok, patch fixed, works for me with Calgary. Andi, it looks like you
> > added the acpi.c NUMA bits originally, perhaps you could test and/or
> > ack them?
>
> Just so there is no misunderstanding, I added the allocation bits.
>
> No
> Ok, patch fixed, works for me with Calgary. Andi, it looks like you
> added the acpi.c NUMA bits originally, perhaps you could test and/or
> ack them?
Just so there is no misunderstanding, I added the allocation bits.
No idea who added the direct usage of ->sysdata for NUMA info.
> diff -r 05
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 01:29:05PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:05:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > This patch introduces struct pci_sysdata to x86 and x86-64, and
> > converts the existing two users (NUMA, Calgary) to use it.
> >
> > This eliminates the confli
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:05:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> This patch introduces struct pci_sysdata to x86 and x86-64, and
> converts the existing two users (NUMA, Calgary) to use it.
>
> This eliminates the conflict between NUMA and Calgary using the same
> pointer for different uses, and
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:05:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> This patch introduces struct pci_sysdata to x86 and x86-64, and
> converts the existing two users (NUMA, Calgary) to use it.
>
> This eliminates the conflict between NUMA and Calgary using the same
> pointer for different uses, and
This patch introduces struct pci_sysdata to x86 and x86-64, and
converts the existing two users (NUMA, Calgary) to use it.
This eliminates the conflict between NUMA and Calgary using the same
pointer for different uses, and lays the groundwork for adding x86
PCI domain support.
Signed-off-by: Je
6 matches
Mail list logo
