Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:26:08PM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote:
On Thu Dec 14, 2006 at 03:05:52PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
FWIW, libata generally follows a "implement it, if enough people care
about it" policy for the old HDIO_xxx ioctls.
I personally care about HDIO_GET
Erik Andersen wrote:
On Thu Dec 14, 2006 at 03:31:30PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Erik Andersen wrote:
+ if (!atapi_enabled && dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATAPI) {
This seems like an impossible condition?
Hmm, suppose so. Do you think that simply doing:
if (dev->class
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:26:08PM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Thu Dec 14, 2006 at 03:05:52PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > FWIW, libata generally follows a "implement it, if enough people care
> > about it" policy for the old HDIO_xxx ioctls.
>
> I personally care about HDIO_GET_IDENTITY and
On Thu Dec 14, 2006 at 03:31:30PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Erik Andersen wrote:
> >+if (!atapi_enabled && dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATAPI) {
>
> This seems like an impossible condition?
Hmm, suppose so. Do you think that simply doing:
if (dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATAPI) {
Erik Andersen wrote:
+ if (!atapi_enabled && dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATAPI) {
This seems like an impossible condition?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
On Thu Dec 14, 2006 at 03:05:52PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> FWIW, libata generally follows a "implement it, if enough people care
> about it" policy for the old HDIO_xxx ioctls.
I personally care about HDIO_GET_IDENTITY and find it terribly
useful to quickly find out about a drive. Perhaps eno
6 matches
Mail list logo