Re: [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (for realthis time)

Bogdan Costescu wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > > > But, each time a user cats this proc file, the user is banging the > > > hardware. What happens when a malicious user forks off 100 processes to > > > continually cat this file? :) > > > > Nothing good, probably. Same

Re: [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (for realthis time)

Bogdan Costescu wrote: On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Pete Zaitcev wrote: But, each time a user cats this proc file, the user is banging the hardware. What happens when a malicious user forks off 100 processes to continually cat this file? :) Nothing good, probably. Same story as

Re: [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (for realthis time)

Tim Hockin said once upon a time (Thu, 31 May 2001): > Aattached is a (large, but self contained) patch for Cobalt Networks suport > for x86 systems (RaQ3, RaQ4, Qube3, RaQXTR). Please let me know if there > is anything that would prevent this from general inclusion in the next > release. I

Re: [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (for realthis time)

Tim Hockin said once upon a time (Thu, 31 May 2001): Aattached is a (large, but self contained) patch for Cobalt Networks suport for x86 systems (RaQ3, RaQ4, Qube3, RaQXTR). Please let me know if there is anything that would prevent this from general inclusion in the next release. I can