Re: [PATCH] swim: Add missing spinlock init

2013-01-13 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Jean, On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:03:27 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: >> > It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. >> >> Quiet possible. There's no SMP on m68k, so all sp

Re: [PATCH] swim: Add missing spinlock init

2012-12-16 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Geert, On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:03:27 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. > > Quiet possible. There's no SMP on m68k, so all spinlock ops expand to nothing. Can we apply my patch still

Re: [PATCH] swim: Add missing spinlock init

2012-09-06 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. Quiet possible. There's no SMP on m68k, so all spinlock ops expand to nothing. > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare > Cc: Finn Thain > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- > I can't even build-test

[PATCH] swim: Add missing spinlock init

2012-09-06 Thread Jean Delvare
It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare Cc: Finn Thain Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven --- I can't even build-test this. drivers/block/swim.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- linux-3.6-rc4.orig/drivers/block/swim.c 2012-07-21 22:58:29.00