Hi Robin,
On 2019-05-22 15:55, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 22/05/2019 14:34, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 02:25:38PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> Sure, but that should be irrelevant since the effective problem here
>>> is in
>>> the sync_*_for_cpu direction, and it's the unm
On 2019-05-22 2:09 pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:50:47PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
Would that work out any different from the existing DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC?
If drivers are prepared to handle this issue from their end, they can
already do so for single mappings by us
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:50:47PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Would that work out any different from the existing DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC?
>
> If drivers are prepared to handle this issue from their end, they can
> already do so for single mappings by using that attr along with explicit
> parti
3 matches
Mail list logo