Re: [PATCH] sysfs_buffer: use mutex

2007-06-25 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:14:44AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > I don't see any reason why this is a semaphore, convert. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There has been a _lot_ of work in this area and this patch doesn't apply at all to my tree. Can you respin it agains the

Re: [PATCH] sysfs_buffer: use mutex

2007-06-25 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:14:44AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: I don't see any reason why this is a semaphore, convert. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] There has been a _lot_ of work in this area and this patch doesn't apply at all to my tree. Can you respin it agains the next

[PATCH] sysfs_buffer: use mutex

2007-06-22 Thread Johannes Berg
I don't see any reason why this is a semaphore, convert. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/sysfs/file.c | 13 +++-- fs/sysfs/inode.c |4 ++-- fs/sysfs/sysfs.h |2 +- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- wireless-dev.orig/fs/sysfs/file.c

[PATCH] sysfs_buffer: use mutex

2007-06-22 Thread Johannes Berg
I don't see any reason why this is a semaphore, convert. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- fs/sysfs/file.c | 13 +++-- fs/sysfs/inode.c |4 ++-- fs/sysfs/sysfs.h |2 +- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- wireless-dev.orig/fs/sysfs/file.c