On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 13:22 -0600, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 18:16 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > We get a Kconfig warning when selecting this without also enabling
> > CONFIG_PCI:
> >
> > warning: (X86_INTEL_LPSS && INTEL_SOC_DTS_IOSF_CORE &&
> > SND_SST_IPC_ACPI
On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 13:22 -0600, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 18:16 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > We get a Kconfig warning when selecting this without also enabling
> > CONFIG_PCI:
> >
> > warning: (X86_INTEL_LPSS && INTEL_SOC_DTS_IOSF_CORE &&
> > SND_SST_IPC_ACPI
On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 18:16 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> We get a Kconfig warning when selecting this without also enabling
> CONFIG_PCI:
>
> warning: (X86_INTEL_LPSS && INTEL_SOC_DTS_IOSF_CORE &&
> SND_SST_IPC_ACPI && MMC_SDHCI_ACPI && PUNIT_ATOM_DEBUG) selects
> IOSF_MBI which has unmet direct
On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 18:16 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> We get a Kconfig warning when selecting this without also enabling
> CONFIG_PCI:
>
> warning: (X86_INTEL_LPSS && INTEL_SOC_DTS_IOSF_CORE &&
> SND_SST_IPC_ACPI && MMC_SDHCI_ACPI && PUNIT_ATOM_DEBUG) selects
> IOSF_MBI which has unmet direct
We get a Kconfig warning when selecting this without also enabling
CONFIG_PCI:
warning: (X86_INTEL_LPSS && INTEL_SOC_DTS_IOSF_CORE && SND_SST_IPC_ACPI &&
MMC_SDHCI_ACPI && PUNIT_ATOM_DEBUG) selects IOSF_MBI which has unmet direct
dependencies (PCI)
This adds a new depedency.
Fixes:
We get a Kconfig warning when selecting this without also enabling
CONFIG_PCI:
warning: (X86_INTEL_LPSS && INTEL_SOC_DTS_IOSF_CORE && SND_SST_IPC_ACPI &&
MMC_SDHCI_ACPI && PUNIT_ATOM_DEBUG) selects IOSF_MBI which has unmet direct
dependencies (PCI)
This adds a new depedency.
Fixes:
6 matches
Mail list logo