Hi Jacob,
On 12/23/2014 08:27 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 07:01:12 +0530
> Preeti U Murthy wrote:
>
>> On 12/20/2014 01:26 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Fri, 19 Dec 2014, Jacob Pan wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:12:57 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 07:01:12 +0530
Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> On 12/20/2014 01:26 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Dec 2014, Jacob Pan wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:12:57 +0100 (CET)
> >> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Jacob Pan wrote:
> OK I agree,
On 12/20/2014 01:26 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2014, Jacob Pan wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:12:57 +0100 (CET)
>> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Jacob Pan wrote:
OK I agree, also as I mentioned earlier, Peter already has a patch
for consolidated
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:12:57 +0100 (CET)
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > > OK I agree, also as I mentioned earlier, Peter already has a patch
> > > for consolidated idle loop and remove tick_nohz_idle_enter/exit
> >
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:12:57 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > OK I agree, also as I mentioned earlier, Peter already has a patch
> > for consolidated idle loop and remove tick_nohz_idle_enter/exit
> > call from powerclamp driver. I have been working o
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Jacob Pan wrote:
> OK I agree, also as I mentioned earlier, Peter already has a patch for
> consolidated idle loop and remove tick_nohz_idle_enter/exit call from
> powerclamp driver. I have been working on a few tweaks to maintain the
> functionality and efficiency with the con
t; Weisbecker; LKML; LKP; Zhang, Rui Subject: Re: [PATCH]
> tick/powerclamp: Remove tick_nohz_idle abuse
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 12/18/2014 04:21 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > commit 4dbd27711cd9 "tick: export nohz tick idle symbols for module
> > use" was mer
Hi Thomas,
On 12/18/2014 04:21 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> commit 4dbd27711cd9 "tick: export nohz tick idle symbols for module
> use" was merged via the thermal tree without an explicit ack from the
> relevant maintainers.
>
> The exports are abused by the intel powerclamp driver which implement
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > The real solution is to fix the powerclamp driver by rewriting it with
> > a sane concept, but that's beyond the scope of this.
> >
>
> Do you have suggestions on what exactly is the expected rewriting or the
> correct sane concepts?
There was qui
Hello Thomas,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:51:01AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> commit 4dbd27711cd9 "tick: export nohz tick idle symbols for module
> use" was merged via the thermal tree without an explicit ack from the
> relevant maintainers.
>
This is a shame. Rui, do you have any comments on
commit 4dbd27711cd9 "tick: export nohz tick idle symbols for module
use" was merged via the thermal tree without an explicit ack from the
relevant maintainers.
The exports are abused by the intel powerclamp driver which implements
a fake idle state from a sched FIFO task. This causes all kinds of
11 matches
Mail list logo
