On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:16 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 10:11 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> sysfs_get_uname() is erroneously declared as returning size_t even
>> though it may return a negative value, specifically -EINVAL. Its
>> callers then check whether its return value is less than
On 10/11/2013 10:11 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> sysfs_get_uname() is erroneously declared as returning size_t even
> though it may return a negative value, specifically -EINVAL. Its
> callers then check whether its return value is less than zero and indeed
> that is never the case for size_t.
>
> T
sysfs_get_uname() is erroneously declared as returning size_t even
though it may return a negative value, specifically -EINVAL. Its
callers then check whether its return value is less than zero and indeed
that is never the case for size_t.
This patch changes sysfs_get_uname() to return ssize_t an
3 matches
Mail list logo
