On 06/27/2016 02:32 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:43:00PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 06/24/2016 01:48 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:36:55AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
Introduce TPM_VTPM_PROXY_NO_SYSFS flag that prevents a vtpm_proxy driver
On 06/27/2016 02:32 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:43:00PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 06/24/2016 01:48 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:36:55AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
Introduce TPM_VTPM_PROXY_NO_SYSFS flag that prevents a vtpm_proxy driver
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:43:00PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 06/24/2016 01:48 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:36:55AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>Introduce TPM_VTPM_PROXY_NO_SYSFS flag that prevents a vtpm_proxy driver
> >>instance from having the typical sysfs
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:43:00PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 06/24/2016 01:48 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:36:55AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>Introduce TPM_VTPM_PROXY_NO_SYSFS flag that prevents a vtpm_proxy driver
> >>instance from having the typical sysfs
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:43:00PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 06/24/2016 01:48 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:36:55AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>Introduce TPM_VTPM_PROXY_NO_SYSFS flag that prevents a vtpm_proxy driver
> >>instance from having the typical sysfs
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:43:00PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 06/24/2016 01:48 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:36:55AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>Introduce TPM_VTPM_PROXY_NO_SYSFS flag that prevents a vtpm_proxy driver
> >>instance from having the typical sysfs
On 06/24/2016 01:48 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:36:55AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
Introduce TPM_VTPM_PROXY_NO_SYSFS flag that prevents a vtpm_proxy driver
instance from having the typical sysfs entries that shows the state of the
TPM. The flag is to be set in the
On 06/24/2016 01:48 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:36:55AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
Introduce TPM_VTPM_PROXY_NO_SYSFS flag that prevents a vtpm_proxy driver
instance from having the typical sysfs entries that shows the state of the
TPM. The flag is to be set in the
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:36:55AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Introduce TPM_VTPM_PROXY_NO_SYSFS flag that prevents a vtpm_proxy driver
> instance from having the typical sysfs entries that shows the state of the
> TPM. The flag is to be set in the ioctl creating the vtpm_proxy device
> pair and
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:36:55AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Introduce TPM_VTPM_PROXY_NO_SYSFS flag that prevents a vtpm_proxy driver
> instance from having the typical sysfs entries that shows the state of the
> TPM. The flag is to be set in the ioctl creating the vtpm_proxy device
> pair and
Introduce TPM_VTPM_PROXY_NO_SYSFS flag that prevents a vtpm_proxy driver
instance from having the typical sysfs entries that shows the state of the
TPM. The flag is to be set in the ioctl creating the vtpm_proxy device
pair and maps on a new chip flags TPM_CHIP_FLAG_NO_SYSFS.
This flag would be
Introduce TPM_VTPM_PROXY_NO_SYSFS flag that prevents a vtpm_proxy driver
instance from having the typical sysfs entries that shows the state of the
TPM. The flag is to be set in the ioctl creating the vtpm_proxy device
pair and maps on a new chip flags TPM_CHIP_FLAG_NO_SYSFS.
This flag would be
12 matches
Mail list logo