Re: [PATCH] tpm_infineon: Bugfix in PNPACPI-handling

Marcel Selhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This patch corrects the PNP-handling inside the tpm-driver > and some minor coding style bugs. But the patch adds lots of new coding style bugs! > ... > @@ -356,24 +356,26 @@ static const struct pnp_device_id tpm_pn > {"IFX0102", 0}, >

[PATCH] tpm_infineon: Bugfix in PNPACPI-handling

Dear all, Changelog: This patch corrects the PNP-handling inside the tpm-driver and some minor coding style bugs. Note: the pci-device and pnp-device mixture is currently necessary, since the used "tpm"-interface requires a pci-dev in order to register the driver. This will be fixed within the

[PATCH] tpm_infineon: Bugfix in PNPACPI-handling

Dear all, Changelog: This patch corrects the PNP-handling inside the tpm-driver and some minor coding style bugs. Note: the pci-device and pnp-device mixture is currently necessary, since the used tpm-interface requires a pci-dev in order to register the driver. This will be fixed within the

Re: [PATCH] tpm_infineon: Bugfix in PNPACPI-handling

Marcel Selhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch corrects the PNP-handling inside the tpm-driver and some minor coding style bugs. But the patch adds lots of new coding style bugs! ... @@ -356,24 +356,26 @@ static const struct pnp_device_id tpm_pn {IFX0102, 0}, {, 0}