Re: [PATCH] trace-cmd: Print relate stacktrace at once

2015-12-21 16:54 GMT+09:00 Namhyung Kim : > From: Namhyung Kim > > Currently trace-cmd prints ring buffer events in a strict time order. > But it sometimes annoying that stacktrace from the same cpu can be > intermixed with events from other cpu. This patch looks next event when > print last

Re: [PATCH] trace-cmd: Print relate stacktrace at once

2015-12-21 16:54 GMT+09:00 Namhyung Kim : > From: Namhyung Kim > > Currently trace-cmd prints ring buffer events in a strict time order. > But it sometimes annoying that stacktrace from the same cpu can be > intermixed with events from other cpu. This

[PATCH] trace-cmd: Print relate stacktrace at once

From: Namhyung Kim Currently trace-cmd prints ring buffer events in a strict time order. But it sometimes annoying that stacktrace from the same cpu can be intermixed with events from other cpu. This patch looks next event when print last record and prints it also if it's a stacktrace (from the

[PATCH] trace-cmd: Print relate stacktrace at once

From: Namhyung Kim Currently trace-cmd prints ring buffer events in a strict time order. But it sometimes annoying that stacktrace from the same cpu can be intermixed with events from other cpu. This patch looks next event when print last record and prints it also if it's a