On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
> * Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>> wrote:
>> > * Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On
* Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> wrote:
> > * Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >> >> *
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
> * Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> >> * Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
>> >> > On Wed,
* Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >> * Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > >
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Keun-O Park wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> * Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> >
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> * Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > > From: Sahara
>> > >
>> > > Somehow
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Sahara
> > >
> > > Somehow tracepoint_entry_add/remove_probe functions allow a null probe
> > > function.
> >
* Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Sahara
> >
> > Somehow tracepoint_entry_add/remove_probe functions allow a null probe
> > function.
>
> You actually hit this in practice, or is this just something that you
>
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Sahara
>
> Somehow tracepoint_entry_add/remove_probe functions allow a null probe
> function.
You actually hit this in practice, or is this just something that you
observe from code review?
> Especially on getting a null
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sahara keun-o.p...@windriver.com
Somehow tracepoint_entry_add/remove_probe functions allow a null probe
function.
You actually hit this in practice, or is this just something that you
observe from code review?
Especially
* Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sahara keun-o.p...@windriver.com
Somehow tracepoint_entry_add/remove_probe functions allow a null probe
function.
You actually hit this in practice, or is this just
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sahara keun-o.p...@windriver.com
Somehow tracepoint_entry_add/remove_probe functions allow a null probe
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sahara keun-o.p...@windriver.com
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Keun-O Park kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900,
* Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
* Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Steven Rostedt
* Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
* Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
* Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
* Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at
From: Sahara
Somehow tracepoint_entry_add/remove_probe functions allow a null probe
function. Especially on getting a null probe in remove function, it seems
to be used to remove all probe functions in the entry.
But, the code is not handled as expected. Since the tracepoint_entry
maintains
From: Sahara keun-o.p...@windriver.com
Somehow tracepoint_entry_add/remove_probe functions allow a null probe
function. Especially on getting a null probe in remove function, it seems
to be used to remove all probe functions in the entry.
But, the code is not handled as expected. Since the
20 matches
Mail list logo
