On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
> * Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>> wrote:
>> > * Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On
* Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> wrote:
> > * Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >> >> * S
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
> * Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> >> * Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, 20
* Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >> * Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > > From:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Keun-O Park wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> * Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> >
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> * Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > > From: Sahara
>> > >
>> > > Somehow tracepoint_entry_add/r
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Sahara
> > >
> > > Somehow tracepoint_entry_add/remove_probe functions allow a null probe
> > > function.
> >
* Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Sahara
> >
> > Somehow tracepoint_entry_add/remove_probe functions allow a null probe
> > function.
>
> You actually hit this in practice, or is this just something that you
>
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Sahara
>
> Somehow tracepoint_entry_add/remove_probe functions allow a null probe
> function.
You actually hit this in practice, or is this just something that you
observe from code review?
> Especially on getting a null pro
From: Sahara
Somehow tracepoint_entry_add/remove_probe functions allow a null probe
function. Especially on getting a null probe in remove function, it seems
to be used to remove all probe functions in the entry.
But, the code is not handled as expected. Since the tracepoint_entry
maintains funcs
10 matches
Mail list logo