Re: [PATCH] tracing/kprobes: Fix the order of argument descriptions

2023-11-10 Thread Google
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 15:18:14 +0530 Mukesh Ojha wrote: > > > On 10/31/2023 9:43 AM, Yujie Liu wrote: > > The order of descriptions should be consistent with the argument list of > > the function, so "kretprobe" should be the second one. > > > > int __kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start(struct

Re: [PATCH] tracing/kprobes: Fix the order of argument descriptions

2023-10-31 Thread Mukesh Ojha
On 10/31/2023 9:43 AM, Yujie Liu wrote: The order of descriptions should be consistent with the argument list of the function, so "kretprobe" should be the second one. int __kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start(struct dynevent_cmd *cmd, bool kretprobe, const char

[PATCH] tracing/kprobes: Fix the order of argument descriptions

2023-10-30 Thread Yujie Liu
The order of descriptions should be consistent with the argument list of the function, so "kretprobe" should be the second one. int __kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start(struct dynevent_cmd *cmd, bool kretprobe, const char *name, const char *loc, ...) Fixes: 2a588dd1d5d6