Hello:
This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Steven Rostedt (Google) :
On Thu, 16 May 2024 13:34:54 -0400 you wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> [
>This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this patch again in
>the second week of the merge window of
On 5/17/24 11:00, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 5/17/24 10:48, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 17 May 2024 10:36:37 -0700
Guenter Roeck wrote:
Building csky:allmodconfig (and others) ... failed
--
Error log:
In file included from include/trace/trace_events.h:419,
from
On 5/17/24 10:48, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 17 May 2024 10:36:37 -0700
Guenter Roeck wrote:
Building csky:allmodconfig (and others) ... failed
--
Error log:
In file included from include/trace/trace_events.h:419,
from include/trace/define_trace.h:102,
On Fri, 17 May 2024 10:36:37 -0700
Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Building csky:allmodconfig (and others) ... failed
> --
> Error log:
> In file included from include/trace/trace_events.h:419,
> from include/trace/define_trace.h:102,
> from
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:34:54PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> [
>This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this patch again in
>the second week of the merge window of v6.10 and submit it then. Hoping
>to keep the conflicts that it will
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:34:54PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> [
>This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this patch again in
>the second week of the merge window of v6.10 and submit it then. Hoping
>to keep the conflicts that it will
On Fri, 17 May 2024 10:08:51 +0300
Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2024, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > There's over 700 users of __assign_str() and because coccinelle does not
> > handle the TRACE_EVENT() macro I ended up using the following sed script:
> >
> > git grep -l __assign_str |
On Thu, 16 May 2024 19:34:54 +0200,
Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> [
>This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this patch again in
>the second week of the merge window of v6.10 and submit it then. Hoping
>to keep the conflicts that it will
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 7:35 PM Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> [
>This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this patch again in
>the second week of the merge window of v6.10 and submit it then. Hoping
>to keep the conflicts that it will cause
On Thu, 16 May 2024, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> There's over 700 users of __assign_str() and because coccinelle does not
> handle the TRACE_EVENT() macro I ended up using the following sed script:
>
> git grep -l __assign_str | while read a ; do
> sed -e 's/\(__assign_str([^,]*[^ ,]\)
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 09:57:57 -0700
Alison Schofield wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:56:34PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
> >
> > [
> >This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this patch again in
> >the second week of the merge window of
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:56:34PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> [
>This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this patch again in
>the second week of the merge window of v6.9 and submit it then. Hoping
>to keep the conflicts that it will
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:46:53 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Now one thing I could do is to not remove the parameter, but just add:
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE((src) != __data_offsets->item##_ptr_);
>
> in the __assign_str() macro to make sure that it's still the same that is
> assigned. But I'm not
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:50:49 -0500
Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Tangentially related though, what would make me really happy is if we
> could create the string with in the TP__fast_assign() section. I have to
> have a bunch of annoying wrappers right now because the string length
> has to be known
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 01:46:53PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:30:45 -0800
> Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> > On 2/23/2024 9:56 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
> > >
> > > [
> > >This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:30:45 -0800
Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 2/23/2024 9:56 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
> >
> > [
> >This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this patch again in
> >the second week of the merge window of v6.9 and submit it
On 2/23/2024 9:56 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> [
>This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this patch again in
>the second week of the merge window of v6.9 and submit it then. Hoping
>to keep the conflicts that it will cause to a minimum.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:56:34 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Note, the same updates will need to be done for:
>
> __assign_str_len()
> __assign_rel_str()
> __assign_rel_str_len()
Correction: The below macros do not pass in their source to the entry
macros, so they will not need to be
18 matches
Mail list logo
