On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 08:58 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:10:40 +1100
> Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >
> > I like my version better, but your call.
>
> Of course you do :-)
You've got to admit mine is a lot neater looking :)
> I thought about it a bit, and both versions ar
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:10:40 +1100
Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >
> > I don't like setting the swap task flag for syscall tracing, as
> > nothing will unset it.
>
> We could unset it in the unregfunc(), I did that in my original patch
> but took it out because I wasn't sure it was necessary.
Yes
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 13:03 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:35:17 +1100
> Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > In commit 5f893b2639b2 "tracing: Move enabling tracepoints to just after
> > rcu_init()", tracing was enabled earlier in boot.
> >
> > This broke tracing of the raw_sysca
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:35:17 +1100
Michael Ellerman wrote:
> In commit 5f893b2639b2 "tracing: Move enabling tracepoints to just after
> rcu_init()", tracing was enabled earlier in boot.
>
> This broke tracing of the raw_syscall tracepoints from boot using the
> trace_event kernel parameter.
>
>
In commit 5f893b2639b2 "tracing: Move enabling tracepoints to just after
rcu_init()", tracing was enabled earlier in boot.
This broke tracing of the raw_syscall tracepoints from boot using the
trace_event kernel parameter.
When the registration function for the raw_syscall tracepoints runs, it
it
5 matches
Mail list logo