On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 20:01:50 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 09:40:45 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 17:28:11 -0500
> > Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 01:05:34 +0900
> > > "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
>
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 09:40:45 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 17:28:11 -0500
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 01:05:34 +0900
> > "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
> >
> > > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
> > >
> > > Fix to check the tracepoint ev
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 17:28:11 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 01:05:34 +0900
> "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
>
> > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
> >
> > Fix to check the tracepoint event is not valid with $retval.
> > The commit 08c9306fc2e3 ("tracing/fprobe-event: Assu
On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 01:05:34 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
>
> Fix to check the tracepoint event is not valid with $retval.
> The commit 08c9306fc2e3 ("tracing/fprobe-event: Assume fprobe is
> a return event by $retval") introduced automatic return p
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
Fix to check the tracepoint event is not valid with $retval.
The commit 08c9306fc2e3 ("tracing/fprobe-event: Assume fprobe is
a return event by $retval") introduced automatic return probe
conversion with $retval. But since tracepoint event does not
support return p
5 matches
Mail list logo