> On 1. Apr 2021, at 02:18, David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 3/31/21 7:10 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Friendly ping…
>>
>> As this missing change was most likely an oversight in the original commit I
>> do think it should go into 5.12 and subsequently stable as well. That’s also
>> the reason why
On 3/31/21 7:10 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Friendly ping…
>
> As this missing change was most likely an oversight in the original commit I
> do think it should go into 5.12 and subsequently stable as well. That’s also
> the reason why I didn’t send a v2 and changed the commit message / subject
On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 15:10 +0200, Norman Maurer wrote:
> As this missing change was most likely an oversight in the original
> commit I do think it should go into 5.12 and subsequently stable as
> well. That’s also the reason why I didn’t send a v2 and changed the
> commit message / subject for th
Friendly ping…
As this missing change was most likely an oversight in the original commit I do
think it should go into 5.12 and subsequently stable as well. That’s also the
reason why I didn’t send a v2 and changed the commit message / subject for the
patch. For me it clearly is a bug and not
Hi,
> On 26. Mar 2021, at 10:36, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 20:56 +0100, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> From: Norman Maurer
>>
>> Support for UDP_GRO was added in the past but the implementation for
>> getsockopt was missed which did lead to an error when we tried to
>>
Hi,
> On 26. Mar 2021, at 10:36, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 20:56 +0100, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> From: Norman Maurer
>>
>> Support for UDP_GRO was added in the past but the implementation for
>> getsockopt was missed which did lead to an error when we tried to
>>
On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 11:22 +0100, Norman Maurer wrote:
> On 26. Mar 2021, at 10:36, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > One thing you can do to simplifies the maintainer's life, would be post
> > a v2 with the correct tag (and ev. obsolete this patch in patchwork).
>
> I am quite new to contribute patches to
Hi,
> On 26. Mar 2021, at 10:36, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 20:56 +0100, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> From: Norman Maurer
>>
>> Support for UDP_GRO was added in the past but the implementation for
>> getsockopt was missed which did lead to an error when we tried to
>>
Hello,
On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 20:56 +0100, Norman Maurer wrote:
> From: Norman Maurer
>
> Support for UDP_GRO was added in the past but the implementation for
> getsockopt was missed which did lead to an error when we tried to
> retrieve the setting for UDP_GRO. This patch adds the missing switch
From: Norman Maurer
Support for UDP_GRO was added in the past but the implementation for
getsockopt was missed which did lead to an error when we tried to
retrieve the setting for UDP_GRO. This patch adds the missing switch
case for UDP_GRO
Fixes: e20cf8d3f1f7 ("udp: implement GRO for plain UDP
10 matches
Mail list logo