Hi,
John Keeping writes:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:57:21 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Good point. Then how about we just force the value to 1 in f_fs.c and
>> remove the check?
>
> That seems reasonable. Something like this?
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] usb: f_fs: Force
Hi,
John Keeping writes:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:57:21 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Good point. Then how about we just force the value to 1 in f_fs.c and
>> remove the check?
>
> That seems reasonable. Something like this?
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] usb: f_fs: Force Reserved1=1 in
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:57:21 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Good point. Then how about we just force the value to 1 in f_fs.c and
> remove the check?
That seems reasonable. Something like this?
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] usb: f_fs: Force Reserved1=1 in OS_DESC_EXT_COMPAT
The specification says
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:57:21 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Good point. Then how about we just force the value to 1 in f_fs.c and
> remove the check?
That seems reasonable. Something like this?
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] usb: f_fs: Force Reserved1=1 in OS_DESC_EXT_COMPAT
The specification says
Hi,
John Keeping writes:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:40:39 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
>> John Keeping writes:
>> > This check has gone through several incompatible variations in commits
>> > 53642399aa71 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix wrong check on reserved1 of
Hi,
John Keeping writes:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:40:39 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
>> John Keeping writes:
>> > This check has gone through several incompatible variations in commits
>> > 53642399aa71 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix wrong check on reserved1 of
>> > OS_DESC_EXT_COMPAT"),
On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:40:39 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> John Keeping writes:
> > This check has gone through several incompatible variations in commits
> > 53642399aa71 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix wrong check on reserved1 of
> > OS_DESC_EXT_COMPAT"), 354bc45bf329 ("usb: gadget:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:40:39 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> John Keeping writes:
> > This check has gone through several incompatible variations in commits
> > 53642399aa71 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix wrong check on reserved1 of
> > OS_DESC_EXT_COMPAT"), 354bc45bf329 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix
Hi,
John Keeping writes:
> This check has gone through several incompatible variations in commits
> 53642399aa71 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix wrong check on reserved1 of
> OS_DESC_EXT_COMPAT"), 354bc45bf329 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix ExtCompat
> descriptor validation") and
Hi,
John Keeping writes:
> This check has gone through several incompatible variations in commits
> 53642399aa71 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix wrong check on reserved1 of
> OS_DESC_EXT_COMPAT"), 354bc45bf329 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix ExtCompat
> descriptor validation") and 3ba534df815f ("Revert "usb:
This check has gone through several incompatible variations in commits
53642399aa71 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix wrong check on reserved1 of
OS_DESC_EXT_COMPAT"), 354bc45bf329 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix ExtCompat
descriptor validation") and 3ba534df815f ("Revert "usb: gadget: f_fs:
Fix ExtCompat
This check has gone through several incompatible variations in commits
53642399aa71 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix wrong check on reserved1 of
OS_DESC_EXT_COMPAT"), 354bc45bf329 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix ExtCompat
descriptor validation") and 3ba534df815f ("Revert "usb: gadget: f_fs:
Fix ExtCompat
12 matches
Mail list logo