On 09/23/13 15:08, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array
support, wasn't there ?
We should definitely drop it. The feature is an abomination. I thought
gcc only allowed them at the
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array
> support, wasn't there ?
We should definitely drop it. The feature is an abomination. I thought
gcc only allowed them at the end of structs, in the middle of a
On 09/23/13 14:30, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:07:11PM -0400, Behan Webster wrote:
Replying to my patch email just in case it was missed before.
I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array
support, wasn't there ?
There was mostly an objection
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:07:11PM -0400, Behan Webster wrote:
> Replying to my patch email just in case it was missed before.
I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array
support, wasn't there ?
--
balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:07:11PM -0400, Behan Webster wrote:
Replying to my patch email just in case it was missed before.
I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array
support, wasn't there ?
--
balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 09/23/13 14:30, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:07:11PM -0400, Behan Webster wrote:
Replying to my patch email just in case it was missed before.
I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array
support, wasn't there ?
There was mostly an objection
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array
support, wasn't there ?
We should definitely drop it. The feature is an abomination. I thought
gcc only allowed them at the end of structs, in the middle
On 09/23/13 15:08, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array
support, wasn't there ?
We should definitely drop it. The feature is an abomination. I thought
gcc only allowed
Replying to my patch email just in case it was missed before.
Thanks,
Behan
On 08/01/13 21:35, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
From: Behan Webster
The use of variable length arrays in structs (VLAIS) in the Linux Kernel code
precludes the use of compilers which don't implement VLAIS (for
Replying to my patch email just in case it was missed before.
Thanks,
Behan
On 08/01/13 21:35, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
From: Behan Webster beh...@converseincode.com
The use of variable length arrays in structs (VLAIS) in the Linux Kernel code
precludes the use of compilers which
10 matches
Mail list logo