Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget LLVMLinux: Removing the use of VLAIS from the gadget driver

2013-09-23 Thread Behan Webster
On 09/23/13 15:08, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array support, wasn't there ? We should definitely drop it. The feature is an abomination. I thought gcc only allowed them at the

Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget LLVMLinux: Removing the use of VLAIS from the gadget driver

2013-09-23 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array > support, wasn't there ? We should definitely drop it. The feature is an abomination. I thought gcc only allowed them at the end of structs, in the middle of a

Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget LLVMLinux: Removing the use of VLAIS from the gadget driver

2013-09-23 Thread Behan Webster
On 09/23/13 14:30, Felipe Balbi wrote: Hi, On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:07:11PM -0400, Behan Webster wrote: Replying to my patch email just in case it was missed before. I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array support, wasn't there ? There was mostly an objection

Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget LLVMLinux: Removing the use of VLAIS from the gadget driver

2013-09-23 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:07:11PM -0400, Behan Webster wrote: > Replying to my patch email just in case it was missed before. I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array support, wasn't there ? -- balbi signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget LLVMLinux: Removing the use of VLAIS from the gadget driver

2013-09-23 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:07:11PM -0400, Behan Webster wrote: Replying to my patch email just in case it was missed before. I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array support, wasn't there ? -- balbi signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget LLVMLinux: Removing the use of VLAIS from the gadget driver

2013-09-23 Thread Behan Webster
On 09/23/13 14:30, Felipe Balbi wrote: Hi, On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:07:11PM -0400, Behan Webster wrote: Replying to my patch email just in case it was missed before. I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array support, wasn't there ? There was mostly an objection

Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget LLVMLinux: Removing the use of VLAIS from the gadget driver

2013-09-23 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote: I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array support, wasn't there ? We should definitely drop it. The feature is an abomination. I thought gcc only allowed them at the end of structs, in the middle

Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget LLVMLinux: Removing the use of VLAIS from the gadget driver

2013-09-23 Thread Behan Webster
On 09/23/13 15:08, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote: I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array support, wasn't there ? We should definitely drop it. The feature is an abomination. I thought gcc only allowed

Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget LLVMLinux: Removing the use of VLAIS from the gadget driver

2013-09-05 Thread Behan Webster
Replying to my patch email just in case it was missed before. Thanks, Behan On 08/01/13 21:35, beh...@converseincode.com wrote: From: Behan Webster The use of variable length arrays in structs (VLAIS) in the Linux Kernel code precludes the use of compilers which don't implement VLAIS (for

Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget LLVMLinux: Removing the use of VLAIS from the gadget driver

2013-09-05 Thread Behan Webster
Replying to my patch email just in case it was missed before. Thanks, Behan On 08/01/13 21:35, beh...@converseincode.com wrote: From: Behan Webster beh...@converseincode.com The use of variable length arrays in structs (VLAIS) in the Linux Kernel code precludes the use of compilers which