On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >>> > The ordering is more of a recommendation than a necessity. Systems
> >>> > should work oksy if the modules are loaded in the wrong order.
> >>> >
> >>> > The only issue if the drivers are loaded in the wrong order is that
> >>> > full- and low-s
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Alan,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Alan Stern
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Sup
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Alan Stern
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> >
>> >> Support for specifying soft dependencies in the modules themselves wa
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> >
> >> Support for specifying soft dependencies in the modules themselves was
> >> introduced in commit 7cb14ba.
> >>
> >> In Arch we have a
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> Where is MODULE_SOFTDEP defined? It isn't mentioned in any .h files in
> my kernel tree.
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7cb14ba75d57910cc4b62115dd5db7bd83c93684
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Support for specifying soft dependencies in the modules themselves was
> introduced in commit 7cb14ba.
>
> In Arch we have always been shipping a module.d(5) fragment ordering ohci/uhci
> after ehci. If this ordering is really necessary, it would be gre
Hi Alan,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
>> Support for specifying soft dependencies in the modules themselves was
>> introduced in commit 7cb14ba.
>>
>> In Arch we have always been shipping a module.d(5) fragment ordering
>> ohci/
Support for specifying soft dependencies in the modules themselves was
introduced in commit 7cb14ba.
In Arch we have always been shipping a module.d(5) fragment ordering ohci/uhci
after ehci. If this ordering is really necessary, it would be great to move it
to the kernel and getting the correct f
8 matches
Mail list logo