On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:20:37AM +0200, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
>
>
> On 06/05/2016 07:54 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I should have seen earlier that the only caller has already
> > dereferenced udc. So maybe the following will be appropriate in this
> > situation.
> >
>
> Your
On 06/05/2016 07:54 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Friday 03 June 2016 09:29 AM, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/02/2016 03:22 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>> We have been dereferencing udc before checking it. Lets use it after it
>>> has been checked.
>>>
>>
>> To be honest I have mixed
On Friday 03 June 2016 09:29 AM, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
On 06/02/2016 03:22 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
We have been dereferencing udc before checking it. Lets use it after it
has been checked.
To be honest I have mixed feelings about this patch.
On one hand it prevents us from dereferenc
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 03:22 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > We have been dereferencing udc before checking it. Lets use it after it
> > has been checked.
> >
>
> To be honest I have mixed feelings about this patch.
>
> On one hand it prevents us from derefe
On 06/02/2016 03:22 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> We have been dereferencing udc before checking it. Lets use it after it
> has been checked.
>
To be honest I have mixed feelings about this patch.
On one hand it prevents us from dereferencing potential NULL ptr what is
generally good. But on th
We have been dereferencing udc before checking it. Lets use it after it
has been checked.
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee
---
drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_sysfs.c | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_sysfs.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_sysfs.c
i
6 matches
Mail list logo