On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:15:23PM -0800, Kevin Lloyd wrote:
> > > Correct, the 0x0023 is the only newly added device that requires the
> new
> > > features.
> >
> > Does that mean things will not work for this device if it is added to
> > the device table, without the code updates?
> Adding the
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:15:23PM -0800, Kevin Lloyd wrote:
Correct, the 0x0023 is the only newly added device that requires the
new
features.
Does that mean things will not work for this device if it is added to
the device table, without the code updates?
Adding the device will not
> > Correct, the 0x0023 is the only newly added device that requires the
new
> > features.
>
> Does that mean things will not work for this device if it is added to
> the device table, without the code updates?
Adding the device will not break the driver (assuming you remove the
tag).
> And is
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:21:32AM -0800, Kevin Lloyd wrote:
> > Hm, no, the intrusion into the driver is just too much this late in
> the
> > release cycle to allow this.
> >
> > Now I will be glad to only add the new device ids for the devices that
> > do not rely on the new changes right now,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:21:32AM -0800, Kevin Lloyd wrote:
Hm, no, the intrusion into the driver is just too much this late in
the
release cycle to allow this.
Now I will be glad to only add the new device ids for the devices that
do not rely on the new changes right now, but that's
Correct, the 0x0023 is the only newly added device that requires the
new
features.
Does that mean things will not work for this device if it is added to
the device table, without the code updates?
Adding the device will not break the driver (assuming you remove the
tag).
And is this
> Hm, no, the intrusion into the driver is just too much this late in
the
> release cycle to allow this.
>
> Now I will be glad to only add the new device ids for the devices that
> do not rely on the new changes right now, but that's it.
>
> So, right now I have a separate patch split out of your
Hm, no, the intrusion into the driver is just too much this late in
the
release cycle to allow this.
Now I will be glad to only add the new device ids for the devices that
do not rely on the new changes right now, but that's it.
So, right now I have a separate patch split out of your
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:24:36AM -0800, Kevin Lloyd wrote:
> > Those device ids are already in my tree, as it was my understanding
> that
> > you would not be sending me patches for them :)
> You're right, I normally wouldn't, but since someone else already had, I
> figured it would be alright.
> Those device ids are already in my tree, as it was my understanding
that
> you would not be sending me patches for them :)
You're right, I normally wouldn't, but since someone else already had, I
figured it would be alright.
> I'll split this patch up into something that updates the device ids
Those device ids are already in my tree, as it was my understanding
that
you would not be sending me patches for them :)
You're right, I normally wouldn't, but since someone else already had, I
figured it would be alright.
I'll split this patch up into something that updates the device ids
and
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:24:36AM -0800, Kevin Lloyd wrote:
Those device ids are already in my tree, as it was my understanding
that
you would not be sending me patches for them :)
You're right, I normally wouldn't, but since someone else already had, I
figured it would be alright.
I'll
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:11:04AM -0800, Kevin Lloyd wrote:
> From: Kevin Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch is targeted for the 2.6.24-rc7 kernel.
>
> The following improvements were made:
> - Added new product support: MC5725, AC 880 U, MP 3G (UMTS & CDMA)
> - Fixed control line issue
From: Kevin Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch is targeted for the 2.6.24-rc7 kernel.
The following improvements were made:
- Added new product support: MC5725, AC 880 U, MP 3G (UMTS & CDMA)
- Fixed control line issue where asserting DTR on ep5 would close ep2
- Added support for
From: Kevin Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch is targeted for the 2.6.24-rc7 kernel.
The following improvements were made:
- Added new product support: MC5725, AC 880 U, MP 3G (UMTS CDMA)
- Fixed control line issue where asserting DTR on ep5 would close ep2
- Added support for
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:11:04AM -0800, Kevin Lloyd wrote:
From: Kevin Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch is targeted for the 2.6.24-rc7 kernel.
The following improvements were made:
- Added new product support: MC5725, AC 880 U, MP 3G (UMTS CDMA)
- Fixed control line issue where
16 matches
Mail list logo
