Mike Castle wrote:
> (libc does usually take care to be able to build against a later kernel
> version than you're running on, and determine at run time what features may
> or may not be there, so one could have a 2.4.2 kernel handy to build libc
> against while still running a 2.2.18 kernel. The
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:40:55PM -0800, Robert Read wrote:
> Ok, my bad, I forgot about cross-compiles. The problem was
> scripts/split-include.c includes errno.h, which requires linux/errno.h
> to exist, and I thought it would be better to use the current kernel's
> version, rather than the sys
Ok, my bad, I forgot about cross-compiles. The problem was
scripts/split-include.c includes errno.h, which requires linux/errno.h
to exist, and I thought it would be better to use the current kernel's
version, rather than the system version. I guess not.
robert
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:28:58P
> FINDHPATH = $(HPATH)/asm $(HPATH)/linux $(HPATH)/scsi $(HPATH)/net
>
> HOSTCC = gcc
> -HOSTCFLAGS = -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
> +HOSTCFLAGS = -I$(HPATH) -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
That seems odd. Which build tools need to
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Robert Read wrote:
> Please apply one line patch to the top level Makefile. This points
> the build tools at the correct linux include dir.
Or please don't, it's incorrect.
It breaks cross-compiling, and just generally wrong. If your
system won't build without this, it's
Linus,
Please apply one line patch to the top level Makefile. This points
the build tools at the correct linux include dir.
diff -ru linux/Makefile linux-makefile/Makefile
--- linux/Makefile Wed Feb 21 16:54:15 2001
+++ linux-makefile/Makefile Thu Feb 22 12:34:57 2001
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
6 matches
Mail list logo
