On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 03:38:20PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Nick has decided he wants to be a kernel developer, a laudable goal.
>
> He however has decided not to take any advice given to me by a number of other
> kernel developers on how to work on the kernel. So instead he sends random
> b
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> Dave,
>> I understand your issues with my programming. I need to try and
>> understand the kernel first before programming
>> for it.
>
> Why do you insist on sending more patches then, every day you try and
> send another one or two, despit
>
> Dave,
> I understand your issues with my programming. I need to try and
> understand the kernel first before programming
> for it.
Why do you insist on sending more patches then, every day you try and
send another one or two, despite been
told multiple times to a) understand what you are writi
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Nick Krause wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On 4 August 2014 15:03, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On 08/04/2014 05:25 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
This patch changes the call of vb2_buffer_core to use
VB2_BUFFER_STATE_ACTIVE
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 4 August 2014 15:03, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 08/04/2014 05:25 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>>> This patch changes the call of vb2_buffer_core to use
>>> VB2_BUFFER_STATE_ACTIVE
>>> inside the for instead of not setting in correctly to
>>>
On 4 August 2014 15:03, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 08/04/2014 05:25 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> This patch changes the call of vb2_buffer_core to use VB2_BUFFER_STATE_ACTIVE
>> inside the for instead of not setting in correctly to VB2_BUFFER_STATE_ERROR.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
>
> D
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 08/04/2014 05:25 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> This patch changes the call of vb2_buffer_core to use VB2_BUFFER_STATE_ACTIVE
>> inside the for instead of not setting in correctly to VB2_BUFFER_STATE_ERROR.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kraus
On 08/04/2014 05:25 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This patch changes the call of vb2_buffer_core to use VB2_BUFFER_STATE_ACTIVE
> inside the for instead of not setting in correctly to VB2_BUFFER_STATE_ERROR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
Dunno what's going on here after reading Dave Airlie's
On 4 August 2014 13:25, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This patch changes the call of vb2_buffer_core to use VB2_BUFFER_STATE_ACTIVE
> inside the for instead of not setting in correctly to VB2_BUFFER_STATE_ERROR.
>
Please go back and read every mail sent to you in the last few weeks.
then read them aga
This patch changes the call of vb2_buffer_core to use VB2_BUFFER_STATE_ACTIVE
inside the for instead of not setting in correctly to VB2_BUFFER_STATE_ERROR.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
---
drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --gi
10 matches
Mail list logo