Re: [PATCH] ver_linux: module-init-tools.patch

2015-10-03 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Jim Davis wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Alexander Kapshuk > wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Alexander Kapshuk >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Jim Davis wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jim Davis wrote: > On Fr

Re: [PATCH] ver_linux: module-init-tools.patch

2015-10-02 Thread Jim Davis
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Alexander Kapshuk > wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Jim Davis wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jim Davis wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Kapshuk >>>

Re: [PATCH] ver_linux: module-init-tools.patch

2015-10-02 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Jim Davis wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jim Davis wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Kapshuk >>> >> +depmod=`whereis depmod | awk '{print $2}'` > >> >>> I suspect

Re: [PATCH] ver_linux: module-init-tools.patch

2015-10-02 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Jim Davis wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jim Davis wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Kapshuk >> > +depmod=`whereis depmod | awk '{print $2}'` > >> I suspect it'll be hard to come up with something that's 100% >> foolproof and

Re: [PATCH] ver_linux: module-init-tools.patch

2015-10-02 Thread Jim Davis
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jim Davis wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Kapshuk > +depmod=`whereis depmod | awk '{print $2}'` >>> > I suspect it'll be hard to come up with something that's 100% > foolproof and respects user's choices. Sticking with searching the > use

Re: [PATCH] ver_linux: module-init-tools.patch

2015-10-02 Thread Jim Davis
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Jim Davis wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Alexander Kapshuk >> wrote: >>> The current implementation relies on 'depmod' to be available in the >>> PATH. It also expects the version number to be

Re: [PATCH] ver_linux: module-init-tools.patch

2015-10-02 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Jim Davis wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Alexander Kapshuk > wrote: >> The current implementation relies on 'depmod' to be available in the >> PATH. It also expects the version number to be found in the last field >> as seen by 'awk'. Should the output f

Re: [PATCH] ver_linux: module-init-tools.patch

2015-10-02 Thread Jim Davis
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > The current implementation relies on 'depmod' to be available in the > PATH. It also expects the version number to be found in the last field > as seen by 'awk'. Should the output format be different, this approach > would no longer be re

[PATCH] ver_linux: module-init-tools.patch

2015-10-01 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
The current implementation relies on 'depmod' to be available in the PATH. It also expects the version number to be found in the last field as seen by 'awk'. Should the output format be different, this approach would no longer be reliable. The proposed implementation locates 'depmod', and uses 'se