nice patch
> 2024. 5. 16. 오전 12:05, Michael S. Tsirkin 작성:
>
> There are two issues around seqpacket_allow:
> 1. seqpacket_allow is not initialized when socket is
> created. Thus if features are never set, it will be
> read uninitialized.
> 2. if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET is set and then cle
On Wed, 15 May 2024 11:05:43 -0400 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> There are two issues around seqpacket_allow:
> 1. seqpacket_allow is not initialized when socket is
>created. Thus if features are never set, it will be
>read uninitialized.
> 2. if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET is set and then clear
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 5:05 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> There are two issues around seqpacket_allow:
> 1. seqpacket_allow is not initialized when socket is
>created. Thus if features are never set, it will be
>read uninitialized.
> 2. if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET is set and then clear
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:05:43AM GMT, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
There are two issues around seqpacket_allow:
1. seqpacket_allow is not initialized when socket is
created. Thus if features are never set, it will be
read uninitialized.
2. if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET is set and then cleared,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:05 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> There are two issues around seqpacket_allow:
> 1. seqpacket_allow is not initialized when socket is
>created. Thus if features are never set, it will be
>read uninitialized.
> 2. if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET is set and then clea
There are two issues around seqpacket_allow:
1. seqpacket_allow is not initialized when socket is
created. Thus if features are never set, it will be
read uninitialized.
2. if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET is set and then cleared,
then seqpacket_allow will not be cleared appropriately
(exist
6 matches
Mail list logo