Pawel Moll writes:
> On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 00:11 +, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Pawel Moll writes:
>> > On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 11:21 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> >> > Having said that, Rusty was contemplating enforcing LE config space in
>> >> > the new PCI layout...
>> >>
>> >> I wouldn't
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 00:11 +, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Pawel Moll writes:
> > On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 11:21 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> > Having said that, Rusty was contemplating enforcing LE config space in
> >> > the new PCI layout...
> >>
> >> I wouldn't complain about that, and would
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 00:11 +, Rusty Russell wrote:
Pawel Moll pawel.m...@arm.com writes:
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 11:21 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Having said that, Rusty was contemplating enforcing LE config space in
the new PCI layout...
I wouldn't complain about that, and would
Pawel Moll pawel.m...@arm.com writes:
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 00:11 +, Rusty Russell wrote:
Pawel Moll pawel.m...@arm.com writes:
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 11:21 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Having said that, Rusty was contemplating enforcing LE config space in
the new PCI layout...
I
Pawel Moll writes:
> On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 11:21 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> > Having said that, Rusty was contemplating enforcing LE config space in
>> > the new PCI layout...
>>
>> I wouldn't complain about that, and would like to see a similar thing on
>> MMIO.
>
> Wherever PCI goes, MMIO
Pawel Moll pawel.m...@arm.com writes:
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 11:21 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Having said that, Rusty was contemplating enforcing LE config space in
the new PCI layout...
I wouldn't complain about that, and would like to see a similar thing on
MMIO.
Wherever PCI goes,
On 01/03/13 12:37, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 11:21 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> Having said that, Rusty was contemplating enforcing LE config space in
>>> the new PCI layout...
>>
>> I wouldn't complain about that, and would like to see a similar thing on
>> MMIO.
>
> Wherever
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 11:21 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Having said that, Rusty was contemplating enforcing LE config space in
> > the new PCI layout...
>
> I wouldn't complain about that, and would like to see a similar thing on
> MMIO.
Wherever PCI goes, MMIO follows :-)
> Well, it was
On 01/03/13 10:50, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 10:41 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 14/02/13 10:54, Pawel Moll wrote:
>>> To solve the never-ending confusions between hosts and guests
>>> of different endianess, define all virtio-mmio registers as LE.
>>>
>>> This change should be
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 10:41 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 14/02/13 10:54, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > To solve the never-ending confusions between hosts and guests
> > of different endianess, define all virtio-mmio registers as LE.
> >
> > This change should be safe at this stage, because no known
>
On 14/02/13 10:54, Pawel Moll wrote:
> To solve the never-ending confusions between hosts and guests
> of different endianess, define all virtio-mmio registers as LE.
>
> This change should be safe at this stage, because no known
> working mixed-endian system exists so there is virtually no
>
On 14/02/13 10:54, Pawel Moll wrote:
To solve the never-ending confusions between hosts and guests
of different endianess, define all virtio-mmio registers as LE.
This change should be safe at this stage, because no known
working mixed-endian system exists so there is virtually no
risk of
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 10:41 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 14/02/13 10:54, Pawel Moll wrote:
To solve the never-ending confusions between hosts and guests
of different endianess, define all virtio-mmio registers as LE.
This change should be safe at this stage, because no known
working
On 01/03/13 10:50, Pawel Moll wrote:
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 10:41 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 14/02/13 10:54, Pawel Moll wrote:
To solve the never-ending confusions between hosts and guests
of different endianess, define all virtio-mmio registers as LE.
This change should be safe at this
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 11:21 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Having said that, Rusty was contemplating enforcing LE config space in
the new PCI layout...
I wouldn't complain about that, and would like to see a similar thing on
MMIO.
Wherever PCI goes, MMIO follows :-)
Well, it was unclear
On 01/03/13 12:37, Pawel Moll wrote:
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 11:21 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Having said that, Rusty was contemplating enforcing LE config space in
the new PCI layout...
I wouldn't complain about that, and would like to see a similar thing on
MMIO.
Wherever PCI goes, MMIO
Pawel Moll writes:
> To solve the never-ending confusions between hosts and guests
> of different endianess, define all virtio-mmio registers as LE.
>
> This change should be safe at this stage, because no known
> working mixed-endian system exists so there is virtually no
> risk of breaking
To solve the never-ending confusions between hosts and guests
of different endianess, define all virtio-mmio registers as LE.
This change should be safe at this stage, because no known
working mixed-endian system exists so there is virtually no
risk of breaking compatibility.
Signed-off-by:
To solve the never-ending confusions between hosts and guests
of different endianess, define all virtio-mmio registers as LE.
This change should be safe at this stage, because no known
working mixed-endian system exists so there is virtually no
risk of breaking compatibility.
Signed-off-by:
Pawel Moll pawel.m...@arm.com writes:
To solve the never-ending confusions between hosts and guests
of different endianess, define all virtio-mmio registers as LE.
This change should be safe at this stage, because no known
working mixed-endian system exists so there is virtually no
risk of
20 matches
Mail list logo
