On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 21:47:03 +0200
Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2013-07-02 11:06:28, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:51:03 +0200
> > Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> > > > b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> > > >
On Tue 2013-07-02 11:06:28, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:51:03 +0200
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> > > b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> > > index ddf4f93..3c589cf 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.tx
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:51:03 +0200
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> > b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> > index ddf4f93..3c589cf 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> > @@ -807,12 +807,14 @
Hi!
> diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> index ddf4f93..3c589cf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> @@ -807,12 +807,14 @@ register a notification, an application must:
>
> - create an event
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:50:51PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:51:29PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > Currently, applications are notified for the level they registered for
> > _plus_ higher levels.
> >
> > This is a problem if the application wants to implement diffe
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:08:27 +0200
Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 25-06-13 17:51:29, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > Currently, applications are notified for the level they registered for
> > _plus_ higher levels.
> >
> > This is a problem if the application wants to implement different
> > actions for
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:20:40 +0900
Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello Michal,
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:59:21AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 26-06-13 16:50:51, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:51:29PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > > Currently, applications are noti
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:03:31 -0700
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:51:29PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > Currently, applications are notified for the level they registered for
> > _plus_ higher levels.
> >
> > This is a problem if the application wants to implement differ
Hello Michal,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:59:21AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 26-06-13 16:50:51, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:51:29PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > Currently, applications are notified for the level they registered for
> > > _plus_ higher levels.
>
On Tue 25-06-13 17:51:29, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> Currently, applications are notified for the level they registered for
> _plus_ higher levels.
>
> This is a problem if the application wants to implement different
> actions for different levels. For example, an application might want
> to releas
On Wed 26-06-13 16:50:51, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:51:29PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > Currently, applications are notified for the level they registered for
> > _plus_ higher levels.
> >
> > This is a problem if the application wants to implement different
> > actions
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:51:29PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> Currently, applications are notified for the level they registered for
> _plus_ higher levels.
>
> This is a problem if the application wants to implement different
> actions for different levels. For example, an application might
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:51:29PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> Currently, applications are notified for the level they registered for
> _plus_ higher levels.
>
> This is a problem if the application wants to implement different
> actions for different levels. For example, an application might
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:12:15 +0900
Hyunhee Kim wrote:
> Please see "[PATCH v3] memcg: event control at vmpressure". mail
> thread. (and also the thread I sent last Saturday.)
> There was discussion on this mode not sending lower events when "level
> != ev->level".
The new argument this patch add
Please see "[PATCH v3] memcg: event control at vmpressure". mail
thread. (and also the thread I sent last Saturday.)
There was discussion on this mode not sending lower events when "level
!= ev->level".
Thanks,
Hyunhee Kim.
2013/6/26 Kyungmin Park :
> + Ms. Kim,
>
> she already raised this issue
+ Ms. Kim,
she already raised this issue at another mail thread.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> Currently, applications are notified for the level they registered for
> _plus_ higher levels.
>
> This is a problem if the application wants to im
Currently, applications are notified for the level they registered for
_plus_ higher levels.
This is a problem if the application wants to implement different
actions for different levels. For example, an application might want
to release 10% of its cache on level low, 50% on medium and 100% on
cr
17 matches
Mail list logo