On 03/11/2013 17:22, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 11/03/2013 06:42 AM, boris brezillon wrote:
Hello Guenter,
Are you okay with the 3 fixes/improvements provided by this patch,
and the explanation I gave regarding the reason for these changes ?
If so, I will submit a new series splitting the patch a
On 11/03/2013 06:42 AM, boris brezillon wrote:
Hello Guenter,
Are you okay with the 3 fixes/improvements provided by this patch,
and the explanation I gave regarding the reason for these changes ?
If so, I will submit a new series splitting the patch and including your
suggestions.
Yes, sorr
Hello Guenter,
Are you okay with the 3 fixes/improvements provided by this patch,
and the explanation I gave regarding the reason for these changes ?
If so, I will submit a new series splitting the patch and including your
suggestions.
Best Regards,
Boris
On 29/10/2013 18:22, boris brezillo
On 14:27 Tue 29 Oct , Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 06:22:47PM +0100, boris brezillon wrote:
> > On 29/10/2013 17:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:22:50PM +0100, boris brezillon wrote:
> > >>On 29/10/2013 16:45, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >>>On Tue, Oct 29
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:27:38 -0700, Guenter Roeck
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 06:22:47PM +0100, boris brezillon wrote:
>> On 29/10/2013 17:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> >On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:22:50PM +0100, boris brezillon wrote:
>> >>On 29/10/2013 16:45, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> >>>On Tue,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 06:22:47PM +0100, boris brezillon wrote:
> On 29/10/2013 17:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:22:50PM +0100, boris brezillon wrote:
> >>On 29/10/2013 16:45, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:37:33AM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>
On 29/10/2013 17:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:22:50PM +0100, boris brezillon wrote:
On 29/10/2013 16:45, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:37:33AM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
Fix the secs_to_ticks macro in case 0 is passed as an argument.
Rework the hear
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:22:50PM +0100, boris brezillon wrote:
> On 29/10/2013 16:45, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:37:33AM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> >>Fix the secs_to_ticks macro in case 0 is passed as an argument.
> >>
> >>Rework the heartbeat calculation to increase
On 29/10/2013 16:45, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:37:33AM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
Fix the secs_to_ticks macro in case 0 is passed as an argument.
Rework the heartbeat calculation to increase the security margin of the
watchdog reset timer.
Use the min_heartbeat value i
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:37:33AM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> Fix the secs_to_ticks macro in case 0 is passed as an argument.
>
> Rework the heartbeat calculation to increase the security margin of the
> watchdog reset timer.
>
> Use the min_heartbeat value instead of the calculated heartbea
Fix the secs_to_ticks macro in case 0 is passed as an argument.
Rework the heartbeat calculation to increase the security margin of the
watchdog reset timer.
Use the min_heartbeat value instead of the calculated heartbeat value for
the first watchdog reset.
Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON
---
d
11 matches
Mail list logo
