Guenter,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 01:34 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>
>> Guenter,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Guenter Roeck
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/26/2013 10:30 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
The existing watchdog timeout worked
On 11/26/2013 01:34 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Guenter,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 11/26/2013 10:30 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
The existing watchdog timeout worked OK but didn't deal with
rounding in an ideal way when dividing out all of its clocks.
Specifically
Guenter,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 10:30 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>
>> The existing watchdog timeout worked OK but didn't deal with
>> rounding in an ideal way when dividing out all of its clocks.
>>
>> Specifically if you had a timeout of 32 seconds
On 11/26/2013 10:30 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
The existing watchdog timeout worked OK but didn't deal with
rounding in an ideal way when dividing out all of its clocks.
Specifically if you had a timeout of 32 seconds and an input clock of
, you'd end up setting a timeout of 31.9998
The existing watchdog timeout worked OK but didn't deal with
rounding in an ideal way when dividing out all of its clocks.
Specifically if you had a timeout of 32 seconds and an input clock of
, you'd end up setting a timeout of 31.9998 seconds and
reporting a timeout of 31 seconds.
The existing watchdog timeout worked OK but didn't deal with
rounding in an ideal way when dividing out all of its clocks.
Specifically if you had a timeout of 32 seconds and an input clock of
, you'd end up setting a timeout of 31.9998 seconds and
reporting a timeout of 31 seconds.
On 11/26/2013 10:30 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
The existing watchdog timeout worked OK but didn't deal with
rounding in an ideal way when dividing out all of its clocks.
Specifically if you had a timeout of 32 seconds and an input clock of
, you'd end up setting a timeout of 31.9998
Guenter,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On 11/26/2013 10:30 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
The existing watchdog timeout worked OK but didn't deal with
rounding in an ideal way when dividing out all of its clocks.
Specifically if you had a timeout of 32
On 11/26/2013 01:34 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Guenter,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On 11/26/2013 10:30 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
The existing watchdog timeout worked OK but didn't deal with
rounding in an ideal way when dividing out all of its
Guenter,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On 11/26/2013 01:34 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Guenter,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net
wrote:
On 11/26/2013 10:30 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
The existing watchdog timeout
10 matches
Mail list logo