Hello,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:49:04AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> There is one test in show_pwq()
> """
> worker == pwq->wq->rescuer ? "(RESCUER)" : "",
> """
> I'm wondering if it needs to be updated to
> """
> worker->rescue_wq ? "(RESCUER)" : "",
> """
Hmm... yeah
Looks good to me.
There is one test in show_pwq()
"""
worker == pwq->wq->rescuer ? "(RESCUER)" : "",
"""
I'm wondering if it needs to be updated to
"""
worker->rescue_wq ? "(RESCUER)" : "",
"""
And document "/* MD: rescue worker */" might be better
than current "/* I: rescue worker */", although
Before actually destrying a workqueue, destroy_workqueue() checks
whether it's actually idle. If it isn't, it prints out a bunch of
warning messages and leaves the workqueue dangling. It unfortunately
has a couple issues.
* Mayday list queueing increments pwq's refcnts which gets detected as
b
3 matches
Mail list logo
