Re: [PATCH] workqueue: kill NOAUTOREL works

ear_pending()? Done. > Acked-By: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks, included. [PATCH] workqueue: kill NOAUTOREL works We don't have any users, and it is not so trivial to use NOAUTOREL works correctly. It is better to simplify API. Delete NOAUTOREL support and rename work

Re: [PATCH] workqueue: kill NOAUTOREL works

Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Delete NOAUTOREL support Yay! > and rename work_release to work_clear_pending to avoid a confusion. Can you add a comment to the effect that this is a function for internal use only? Or maybe make it __work_clear_pending()? Acked-By: David Howells

Re: [PATCH] workqueue: kill NOAUTOREL works

Oleg Nesterov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Delete NOAUTOREL support Yay! and rename work_release to work_clear_pending to avoid a confusion. Can you add a comment to the effect that this is a function for internal use only? Or maybe make it __work_clear_pending()? Acked-By: David Howells

Re: [PATCH] workqueue: kill NOAUTOREL works

Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, included. [PATCH] workqueue: kill NOAUTOREL works We don't have any users, and it is not so trivial to use NOAUTOREL works correctly. It is better to simplify API. Delete NOAUTOREL support and rename work_release to work_clear_pending to avoid a confusion

[PATCH] workqueue: kill NOAUTOREL works

We don't have any users, and it is not so trivial to use NOAUTOREL works correctly. It is better to simplify API. Delete NOAUTOREL support and rename work_release to work_clear_pending to avoid a confusion. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---

[PATCH] workqueue: kill NOAUTOREL works

We don't have any users, and it is not so trivial to use NOAUTOREL works correctly. It is better to simplify API. Delete NOAUTOREL support and rename work_release to work_clear_pending to avoid a confusion. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---