Hello,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:11:26PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Which seems like a strange place to set auto_free as
> > it is not where the rest of base_work is initialized.
>
> Otherwise I agree it's a strange place. I've added Tejun to CC just in case
> he remembers why he's added that.
On Tue 18-08-20 07:13:30, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix
>
> Review fs/fs-writeback.c bdi_split_work_to_wbs
> The CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK version contains this line
> base_work->auto_free = 0;
It is actually the !CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK version...
> Which seems like a strange plac
From: Tom Rix
Review fs/fs-writeback.c bdi_split_work_to_wbs
The CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK version contains this line
base_work->auto_free = 0;
Which seems like a strange place to set auto_free as
it is not where the rest of base_work is initialized.
In the default version of bdi_split_wor
3 matches
Mail list logo
