On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:52:20PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Matthew noticed that hugetlb doesn't participate in ASLR on x86-64.
> The reason is genereic hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() which is used on
> x86-64. It doesn't support randomization and use bottom-up unmapped area
> lookup,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:52:20PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Matthew noticed that hugetlb doesn't participate in ASLR on x86-64.
The reason is genereic hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() which is used on
x86-64. It doesn't support randomization and use bottom-up unmapped area
lookup, instead
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:41:52 +0200 (EET) "Kirill A. Shutemov"
wrote:
> Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Matthew noticed that hugetlb doesn't participate in ASLR on x86-64.
> > The reason is genereic hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() which is used on
> > x86-64. It doesn't support randomization and use
Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Matthew noticed that hugetlb doesn't participate in ASLR on x86-64.
> The reason is genereic hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() which is used on
> x86-64. It doesn't support randomization and use bottom-up unmapped area
> lookup, instead of usual top-down on x86-64.
>
> x86
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:41:52 +0200 (EET) Kirill A. Shutemov
kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Matthew noticed that hugetlb doesn't participate in ASLR on x86-64.
The reason is genereic hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() which is used on
x86-64. It doesn't support
Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Matthew noticed that hugetlb doesn't participate in ASLR on x86-64.
The reason is genereic hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() which is used on
x86-64. It doesn't support randomization and use bottom-up unmapped area
lookup, instead of usual top-down on x86-64.
x86 has
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/22/2013 06:52 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Matthew noticed that hugetlb doesn't participate in ASLR on x86-64.
> > The reason is genereic hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() which is used on
> > x86-64. It doesn't support randomization and use bottom-up unmapped area
> >
On 10/22/2013 06:52 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Matthew noticed that hugetlb doesn't participate in ASLR on x86-64.
> The reason is genereic hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() which is used on
> x86-64. It doesn't support randomization and use bottom-up unmapped area
> lookup, instead of usual
Matthew noticed that hugetlb doesn't participate in ASLR on x86-64.
The reason is genereic hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() which is used on
x86-64. It doesn't support randomization and use bottom-up unmapped area
lookup, instead of usual top-down on x86-64.
x86 has arch-specific
Matthew noticed that hugetlb doesn't participate in ASLR on x86-64.
The reason is genereic hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() which is used on
x86-64. It doesn't support randomization and use bottom-up unmapped area
lookup, instead of usual top-down on x86-64.
x86 has arch-specific
On 10/22/2013 06:52 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Matthew noticed that hugetlb doesn't participate in ASLR on x86-64.
The reason is genereic hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() which is used on
x86-64. It doesn't support randomization and use bottom-up unmapped area
lookup, instead of usual top-down
Dave Hansen wrote:
On 10/22/2013 06:52 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Matthew noticed that hugetlb doesn't participate in ASLR on x86-64.
The reason is genereic hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() which is used on
x86-64. It doesn't support randomization and use bottom-up unmapped area
lookup,
12 matches
Mail list logo