On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 07:43:46AM +, Sironi, Filippo wrote:
> Sorry, I was out of office for a while.
> I'll look into this today.
Prarit is doing a patch too - you might wanna save effort. I leave it up
to you guys to figure out who should do it.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 07:43:46AM +, Sironi, Filippo wrote:
> Sorry, I was out of office for a while.
> I'll look into this today.
Prarit is doing a patch too - you might wanna save effort. I leave it up
to you guys to figure out who should do it.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip
> On 30. Jul 2018, at 18:16, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:23:18AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> Filippo & Borislav, did the patch get committed to a -next tree?
>
> No, I'm still waiting for it - looks like Filippo is busy.
>
> Care to send one instead as
> On 30. Jul 2018, at 18:16, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:23:18AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> Filippo & Borislav, did the patch get committed to a -next tree?
>
> No, I'm still waiting for it - looks like Filippo is busy.
>
> Care to send one instead as
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:23:18AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Filippo & Borislav, did the patch get committed to a -next tree?
No, I'm still waiting for it - looks like Filippo is busy.
Care to send one instead as suggested here?
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:23:18AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Filippo & Borislav, did the patch get committed to a -next tree?
No, I'm still waiting for it - looks like Filippo is busy.
Care to send one instead as suggested here?
On 07/03/2018 05:43 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 09:58:49AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:48:44PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>> On systems where a runtime microcode update has occurred the
>>> microcode version is wrong because
On 07/03/2018 05:43 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 09:58:49AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:48:44PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>> On systems where a runtime microcode update has occurred the
>>> microcode version is wrong because
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 09:58:49AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:48:44PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > On systems where a runtime microcode update has occurred the
> > microcode version is wrong because boot_cpu_data.microcode is
> > not updated during runtime.
> >
> >
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 09:58:49AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:48:44PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > On systems where a runtime microcode update has occurred the
> > microcode version is wrong because boot_cpu_data.microcode is
> > not updated during runtime.
> >
> >
On 07/03/2018 12:58 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:48:44PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> On systems where a runtime microcode update has occurred the
>> microcode version is wrong because boot_cpu_data.microcode is
>> not updated during runtime.
>>
>> Use the per-CPU
On 07/03/2018 12:58 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:48:44PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> On systems where a runtime microcode update has occurred the
>> microcode version is wrong because boot_cpu_data.microcode is
>> not updated during runtime.
>>
>> Use the per-CPU
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:48:44PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On systems where a runtime microcode update has occurred the
> microcode version is wrong because boot_cpu_data.microcode is
> not updated during runtime.
>
> Use the per-CPU microcode version in the MCE message.
Other option
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:48:44PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On systems where a runtime microcode update has occurred the
> microcode version is wrong because boot_cpu_data.microcode is
> not updated during runtime.
>
> Use the per-CPU microcode version in the MCE message.
Other option
On systems where a runtime microcode update has occurred the
microcode version is wrong because boot_cpu_data.microcode is
not updated during runtime.
Use the per-CPU microcode version in the MCE message.
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava
Cc: Tony Luck
Cc: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Thomas Gleixner
On systems where a runtime microcode update has occurred the
microcode version is wrong because boot_cpu_data.microcode is
not updated during runtime.
Use the per-CPU microcode version in the MCE message.
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava
Cc: Tony Luck
Cc: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Thomas Gleixner
16 matches
Mail list logo