On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:21:29PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> LLVM's assembler doesn't accept the short form inl (%%dx) instruction,
> but instead insists on the output register to be explicitly specified:
>
> :1:7: error: invalid operand for instruction
> inl (%dx)
> ^
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 12:21 PM 'Sami Tolvanen' via Clang Built Linux
wrote:
>
> LLVM's assembler doesn't accept the short form inl (%%dx) instruction,
> but instead insists on the output register to be explicitly specified:
>
> :1:7: error: invalid operand for instruction
> inl (%dx)
On 10/7/19 9:21 PM, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> LLVM's assembler doesn't accept the short form inl (%%dx) instruction,
> but instead insists on the output register to be explicitly specified:
>
> :1:7: error: invalid operand for instruction
> inl (%dx)
> ^
> LLVM ERROR: Error
LLVM's assembler doesn't accept the short form inl (%%dx) instruction,
but instead insists on the output register to be explicitly specified:
:1:7: error: invalid operand for instruction
inl (%dx)
^
LLVM ERROR: Error parsing inline asm
Use the full form of the instructi
4 matches
Mail list logo