Re: [PATCH] x86, pkeys: update documentation about availability

2017-11-09 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Dave Hansen wrote: > On 11/09/2017 10:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Dave Hansen wrote: > > > >> > >> From: Dave Hansen > >> > >> Now that CPUs that implement Memory Protection Keys are publicly > >> available we can be a bit less oblique about where it is available. > >> > >> Signed-

Re: [PATCH] x86, pkeys: update documentation about availability

2017-11-09 Thread Dave Hansen
On 11/09/2017 10:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Dave Hansen wrote: > >> >> From: Dave Hansen >> >> Now that CPUs that implement Memory Protection Keys are publicly >> available we can be a bit less oblique about where it is available. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen >> --- >> >> b/Documenta

Re: [PATCH] x86, pkeys: update documentation about availability

2017-11-09 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Dave Hansen wrote: > > From: Dave Hansen > > Now that CPUs that implement Memory Protection Keys are publicly > available we can be a bit less oblique about where it is available. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen > --- > > b/Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt |9 +++-- > 1 file

[PATCH] x86, pkeys: update documentation about availability

2017-11-09 Thread Dave Hansen
From: Dave Hansen Now that CPUs that implement Memory Protection Keys are publicly available we can be a bit less oblique about where it is available. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen --- b/Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt |9 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) dif

[PATCH] x86/pkeys: Update documentation

2016-10-04 Thread Dave Hansen
From: Dave Hansen There are a few items that have gotten stale in the protection keys documentation. The config option description only applied to the execute-only support and is not accurate for the current code. There was also a typo with the number of system calls. I also wanted to call ou