On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 08:43:24AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 3:26 AM Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 07:45:19PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > References:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20201127164131.2244124-1-daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch/
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 3:26 AM Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 07:45:19PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > References:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20201127164131.2244124-1-daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch/
>
> What is the difference between this and "Link:" anyway?
Afaik Refere
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 07:45:19PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> PTE insertion is fundamentally racy, and this check doesn't do
> anything useful. Quoting Sean:
>
> "Yeah, it can be whacked. The original, never-upstreamed code asserted that
> the
> resolved PFN matched the PFN being installed by
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 07:45:19PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> References:
> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20201127164131.2244124-1-daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch/
What is the difference between this and "Link:" anyway?
/Jarkko
PTE insertion is fundamentally racy, and this check doesn't do
anything useful. Quoting Sean:
"Yeah, it can be whacked. The original, never-upstreamed code asserted that the
resolved PFN matched the PFN being installed by the fault handler as a sanity
check on the SGX driver's EPC management. Th
5 matches
Mail list logo