* Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 01:39:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Mind applying the attached cleanup patch first, before doing fixes to
> > the printout? No change in functionality. Mildly tested.
>
> Yeah, boots fine in my strange topology kvm configuration here. We
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 01:39:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Mind applying the attached cleanup patch first, before doing fixes to
> the printout? No change in functionality. Mildly tested.
Yeah, boots fine in my strange topology kvm configuration here. We still
need
ntout? No change in functionality. Mildly tested.
Thanks,
Ingo
>
>From 844f1ed31746c27d7476602b56342c12131016cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:36:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Make the code more consistent
Over the la
,
Ingo
From 844f1ed31746c27d7476602b56342c12131016cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:36:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Make the code more consistent
Over the last decade the smpboot.c code has become a disjunct set
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 01:39:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Mind applying the attached cleanup patch first, before doing fixes to
the printout? No change in functionality. Mildly tested.
Yeah, boots fine in my strange topology kvm configuration here. We still
need
* Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 01:39:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Mind applying the attached cleanup patch first, before doing fixes to
the printout? No change in functionality. Mildly tested.
Yeah, boots fine in my strange topology kvm configuration
6 matches
Mail list logo
