On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:36:31AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > IOW, something which says "Enable KVM guest support" should enable all
> > the stuff needed for that.
>
> I get your point, but thats up to the person selecting the options.
Ok.
> > Or do you want to keep the current CONFIG_KVM
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:46:29AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:25:07PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 06:18:52PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:03:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Apr 14, 201
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:55:33AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > ok, maybe I wasn't clear enough. My proposal was to actually add all (or
> > maybe not *all* of them, but most) those selects above to the KVM_GUEST
> > config option.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> ok, maybe I wasn't clear enough. My proposal was to actually add all (or
> maybe not *all* of them, but most) those selects above to the KVM_GUEST
> config option. Because, you very probably want to select all that stuff
> above anyway if
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:25:07PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 06:18:52PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:03:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:31:12PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > > I obviously support ha
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 06:18:52PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:03:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:31:12PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > I obviously support having something like this in mainline. I wonder
> > > though if we could j
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 08:38:56PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > select NET
> > select NETDEVICES
> > select PCI
> > select BLOCK
> > select BLK_DEV
> > select NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS
> > select INET
> > select EXPERIMENTAL
> > select TTY
> > select SERIAL_8250
>
On 04/16/2013 12:18 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:03:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:31:12PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> I obviously support having something like this in mainline. I wonder
>>> though if we could just call this "default
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:03:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:31:12PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > I obviously support having something like this in mainline. I wonder
> > though if we could just call this "default standalone KVM guest
> > config" instead of emphas
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:31:12PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> I obviously support having something like this in mainline. I wonder
> though if we could just call this "default standalone KVM guest
> config" instead of emphasizing testing angle.
/me nods agreeingly...
And it should be unter HYPE
Hello,
On 4/12/13 9:19 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
so I'm currently experimenting with my randconfig build scripts and
thought that maybe it would be a cool thing to not only do the random
builds only but also boot-test them in kvm. Which reminded me that we
have that KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE config o
On 04/12/13 11:19, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> --
> From efa9a7f7a460bc46d1dd37b691afa88070a34059 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Borislav Petkov
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 20:01:47 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: Add a Kconfig shortcut for a kvm-bootable kernel
>
> This is prett
not strictly needed (yet) but it wouldn't hurt if we took it because
someone has a good reason for needing it.
Thanks.
--
>From efa9a7f7a460bc46d1dd37b691afa88070a34059 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 20:01:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Add a Kconfig
13 matches
Mail list logo
