Re: [PATCH] x86: __kprobes annotations

* Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > __always_inline on some static functions was to ensure they ended up > in the .kprobes.text section. Mark this explicitly. thanks, applied. I rolled this back into your cleanup patch to make sure we have a correct, bisectable kernel at every

Re: [PATCH] x86: __kprobes annotations

* Harvey Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: __always_inline on some static functions was to ensure they ended up in the .kprobes.text section. Mark this explicitly. thanks, applied. I rolled this back into your cleanup patch to make sure we have a correct, bisectable kernel at every commit

Re: [PATCH] x86: __kprobes annotations

Harvey Harrison wrote: > __always_inline on some static functions was to ensure they ended > up in the .kprobes.text section. Mark this explicitly. It is good to me. Thanks! > > Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- >

[PATCH] x86: __kprobes annotations

__always_inline on some static functions was to ensure they ended up in the .kprobes.text section. Mark this explicitly. Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH] x86: __kprobes annotations

__always_inline on some static functions was to ensure they ended up in the .kprobes.text section. Mark this explicitly. Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH] x86: __kprobes annotations

Harvey Harrison wrote: __always_inline on some static functions was to ensure they ended up in the .kprobes.text section. Mark this explicitly. It is good to me. Thanks! Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---